English
Menu
Matchups

OddsShark Top Sportsbooks

Harvard Crimson vs Pennsylvania Quakers Betting Line and Trends Report

Harvard Crimson will go to the free throw line vs Pennsylvania Quakers on Saturday, hoping to boost its 9-12 record with a victory while beating the betting lines set by odds makers.

Harvard Crimson vs Pennsylvania Quakers Matchup

Team Betting Records & Power Rankings

The Pennsylvania Quakers sit at 7-11 (6-5 ATS) on the college basketball season. By comparison, the Harvard Crimson are currently 9-12 (5-9 ATS). Looking to bet on the total points scored? Pennsylvania is 7-4 OU, and Harvard is 8-6 OU.

The Quakers - Crimson odds would favor the Crimson if the lines were set according to our power ranks. Pennsylvania is rated No. 312 in the current Odds Shark poll, while Harvard is at No. 211.

Statistical Matchup

Offensively, the game matches up Pennsylvania's No. 214 nationally ranked offense (68.17 points per game) against a Harvard Crimson defense that sits as the No. 35 at 65.52 PPG. The Pennsylvania Quakers have been averaging 42.87% from the field, less than the Crimson have managed so far this season (44.99% on average).

Recent Outings Betting Recap

Harvard was crushed on Friday, getting blown out by Princeton and falling by a 83-62 score at L. Stockwell Jadwin Gymnasium.

Pennsylvania got 19 points from Darien Nelson-Henry en route to a 71-64 victory over Dartmouth on Friday at Palestra.

Betting Trends
  • Harvard is 1-4 SU in its last 5 games
  • Harvard is 2-9 SU in its last 11 games on the road
  • Harvard is 5-1 ATS in its last 6 games when playing Pennsylvania
  • Harvard is 11-2 SU in its last 13 games when playing Pennsylvania
  • Pennsylvania is 1-4 SU in its last 5 games
  • Pennsylvania is 1-5 ATS in its last 6 games when playing Harvard
  • Pennsylvania is 2-11 SU in its last 13 games when playing Harvard
  • The total has gone UNDER in 6 of Pennsylvania's last 8 games when playing Harvard

Next Betting Matchups

Harvard home to Brown, Friday, February 12th
Pennsylvania at Columbia, Friday, February 12th

Comments