English
Menu
Matchups

OddsShark Top Sportsbooks

Richmond Spiders take on Dukes in NCAA Basketball Betting

A.J. Palumbo Center will host Richmond Spiders vs Duquesne Dukes action on Saturday as both teams try to pay off for those betting on NCAA basketball odds action.

Opening Odds & Computer Pick

Betting fans looking to back the Richmond Spiders before tip-off in this one found them as 0-point over at Bovada earlier.

Richmond Spiders vs Duquesne Dukes Matchup

Team Betting Records & Power Rankings

The Duquesne Dukes bring a 15-13 record (13-12 ATS) to this tilt against the 14-13 Spiders, who are 9-14 ATS. Those OVER/UNDER betting have witnessed Duquesne go 15-10 so far and the Richmond Spiders go 14-9.

The Odds Shark Power Rankings have the Duquesne Dukes at No. 199 and the Richmond Spiders at No. 220 heading into this college basketball betting matchup.

Statistical Matchup

Rebounding is always a key handicapping betting consideration and Richmond is ranked No. 243 in NCAA basketball at 32.37 per game. Contrast that with Duquesne's No. 30 mark in the paint. When it comes to three-point shooting, Duquesne is the No. 19-ranked team in the country at 9.25 per game, while Richmond rates No. 98 at 7.59 per game.

Recent Outings Betting Recap

The Spiders endured a 73-61 loss at the hands of the Colonials on Wednesday, despite a 16-point effort from Terry Allen at Robins Center.

The Dukes got 16 points from Micah Mason, but it was St. Bonaventure that prevailed in a 80-76 final on Wednesday at Reilly Center.

Betting Trends
  • Richmond is 1-4 ATS in its last 5 games
  • The total has gone UNDER in 4 of Richmond's last 6 games
  • Richmond is 3-6 ATS in its last 9 games on the road
  • Richmond is 3-6 SU in its last 9 games on the road
  • Duquesne is 6-3 ATS in its last 9 games
  • Duquesne is 0-5 SU in its last 5 games
  • The total has gone OVER in 11 of Duquesne's last 13 games
  • Duquesne is 16-6 SU in its last 22 games at home

Next Betting Matchups

Richmond home to Dayton, Tuesday, March 1st
Duquesne at Fordham, Wednesday, March 2nd

Comments